In an opening segment of “Jimmy Kimmel Live!”, Jimmy Kimmel expressed his surprise at the new image of congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene — to the point where he wondered whether she might be an “AI-generated alter ego” rather than a real person.

Kimmel described this change as a “Dickensian event”: he joked that Greene “seems like she was visited by three ghosts in the middle of the night,” implying a dramatic shift in her recent statements and behavior. Previously, Greene was known for extreme comments, conspiracy theories, and a confrontational style toward both her fellow Republicans and the opposing party.

However, in recent appearances, she has shown a different image: apologizing for engaging in “toxic politics,” criticizing colleagues within her own party, and calling for the release of Epstein files — moves rarely seen from someone long labeled as tough and controversial.

Kimmel continued to mock the situation by referring to the “breakup” between Trump and Greene: Trump once called her “Traitor Greene,” while earlier he had tried to give her nicknames — and Kimmel said this was “the most famous breakup since Hall & Oates,” hinting at showbiz-level drama.

Beyond the humor, Kimmel posed a deeper question: whether Marjorie Taylor Greene is genuinely “changing” or if the shift is merely a performance meant to draw attention. The transition from an extreme figure to someone making more reasonable remarks has caused many — including Kimmel — to doubt her real motives.

Jimmy Kimmel has often criticized Marjorie Taylor Greene, and this monologue was no exception. However, instead of aggressive attacks as before, he relied mainly on sarcasm and skepticism to raise a larger issue: “Can this person actually change? And if she does, is it the result of true awakening or just a tactic?”

If Greene’s shift is real, it may signal an attempt to reposition herself in politics, especially since many of her past statements and decisions sparked strong controversy. But as Kimmel hinted, using imagery like “ghosts” or an “AI alter ego” reflects the doubt that this could simply be a political performance.

Kimmel also kept the entertainment element: references to a “famous breakup” between Trump and Greene or the idea of “someone visiting her in the night” showcase the humorous style typical of political talk shows.

A notable point is that if Greene truly continues toward a “more rational” direction, she may be planning long-term political positioning — or at least trying to repair her public image (and perhaps her political capital). But if this is a strategic act, it is both clever and risky — because her supporters and critics are watching closely.

Jimmy Kimmel, through his latest monologue, not only criticized Greene as an extreme figure but also questioned the nature of her “transformation.” Is Marjorie Taylor Greene genuinely changing, or is she adopting a new persona — like a “reprogrammed alter ego” — to mislead the public or gain new political advantage?

Although phrased as a joke, Kimmel’s skepticism reflects a broader reality in modern politics: when a polarizing figure suddenly becomes more “softened,” the public and the media must examine carefully whether it is about conviction, strategy, or manipulation.