Có thể là hình ảnh về 3 người, TV và phòng tin tức

Fox News’ Jesse Watters Admits He Erred in Saying Newsom Lied About Trump Phone Call, but Governor Isn’t Dropping Lawsuit: ‘See You in Court, Buddy’

In a recent turn of events, Fox News host Jesse Watters has publicly acknowledged that he was mistaken when he accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of lying about the timing of a phone call with former President Donald Trump. This admission comes amid a high-stakes defamation lawsuit filed by Newsom against Fox News, seeking $787 million in damages. Despite Watters’ concession, Governor Newsom remains resolute in his legal pursuit, signaling that the courtroom battle is far from over.

Jesse Watters’ Admission and Its Impact on the Defamation Lawsuit


Last month, California Governor Gavin Newsom initiated a defamation lawsuit against Fox News and Jesse Watters, alleging that Watters’ on-air statements falsely accused Newsom of dishonesty regarding a critical phone call with then-President Trump. The call in question pertained to the protests in Los Angeles triggered by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids and the subsequent deployment of federal troops to manage the unrest.

 

During a broadcast, Watters claimed that Newsom lied about when the phone call took place, a statement that Newsom’s legal team argued was not only false but damaging to the governor’s reputation. The lawsuit demands $787 million in damages, underscoring the severity of the alleged defamation.

 

In a surprising development, Watters recently admitted that his assertion was incorrect. This admission, however, has not deterred Governor Newsom from continuing with the lawsuit. In a defiant response, Newsom’s camp stated, “See you in court, buddy,” emphasizing their commitment to holding Fox News accountable for what they describe as a pattern of misinformation and character attacks.

 

 

The Broader Implications for Media Accountability and Political Discourse

 

 

Newsom’s lawsuit is seen by many as a test case for how defamation claims against major news networks might be handled in the future. It raises important questions about the balance between free speech and the protection of individuals’ reputations, especially when public figures are involved.